What cropland expansion means for people and the planet? That’s the question Craig Hanson, the Vice President for Food, Forest, Water & the Ocean, World Resources Institute and his colleagues have asked and tried to answer. Read on!
According to a landmark new study, 252 million acres of land — an area the size of Egypt — have been converted to crops since the start of the 21st century. To put this into perspective, while it took more than 8,000 years for humanity to convert 2.8 billion acres of nature into cropland by 2000, it took a mere 20 more years to expand this area by 10 percent.
These findings come from the first high-resolution maps of global crοpland extent and change during the 21st century, recently published in Nature Food by researchers from the University of Maryland and available via the Land & Carbon Lab.
The researchers defined “crοpland” as land used for annual and perennial herbaceous crops for human consumption, animal feed, forage (including hay), and biofuel. The definition excludes pastures and rangelands, shifting cultivation, and tree crops such as fruit orchards, coffee, cocoa, oil palm, and rubber.
These satellite-based findings are troubling news for climate and biodiversity because much of the expansion comes at the expense of forests and other natural ecosystems. Of course, food crops are critical for feeding a growing global population.
Here are five important takeaways from these new maps:
1. Most cropland expansions occurred in Africa and South America
While the Global North created vast areas of crοpland in the past, Africa and South America are undergoing a similar rapid expansion. At 130 million acres, a 34 percent increase, Africa experienced the largest area of net cropland expansion during the past 20 years.
The study suggests that permanent cropland expansion, not simply small-scale shifting agriculture, plays a major role in ecosystem conversion in Africa. South America followed with 84 million acres of net cropland expansion.
These expansion rates are driven by complex dynamics, including local food needs and global demand for commodities grown in Africa and South America.
While net cropland area in North America and Europe remained relatively stable overall, the data reveals significant regional differences, with recultivation of abandoned croplands in the Baltics and extensive declines in crοpland area in Russia.
2. Global cropland expansion is accelerating
Globally, cropland expansion accelerated during the past 20 years, with a near doubling of the annual expansion rate — from 12.6 million acres at the beginning of the study period to 22.2 million acres per year at the end of the study period.
This was particularly the case in Africa, which experienced more than a twofold increase in annual expansion rates, with the highest rates found in Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Angola. In contrast, cropland expansion in South America slowed down, with annual expansion rates declining by almost half by 2019.
The rate of global cropland expansion is close to the rate projected by the World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future, which is higher than most other estimates.
Due to its improved methods, the new satellite-based estimate of cropland area expansion is much higher than the expansion of arable land estimates reported by countries to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) for the same time period.
The lower estimates have led some studies to lower their estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change. However, this new study would suggest that cropland expansion produces more emissions than currently assumed.
3. Gross cropland area expansion is twice as much as net expansion
The new study finds the gross expansion of cropland during the first two decades of this century to be a staggering 539 million acres — an area the size of Greenland. The gross expansion provides a fuller indication of the overall impact of crops on climate and biodiversity than does the net expansion.
In effect, for each hectare of new cropland, two hectares of land were converted. Moreover, only 16 percent of cropland that transitioned to some other use during the time period reverted to native vegetation.
A reverted hectare typically stores less carbon and supports less biodiversity than an unconverted natural hectare because restoration takes a lot of time.
4. Nearly half of new cropland replaced natural ecosystems
Nearly half of the gross cropland expansion area in the 21st century directly replaced natural ecosystems (forests, natural grasslands). In Africa, 79 percent of the gross crοpland gain occurred at the expense of natural vegetation, as well as 61 percent in Southeast Asia and 39 percent in South America.
The other half of the world’s gross cropland expansion replaced pastures, drylands, and previously abandoned arable land. This pattern was dominant in Australia, Europe, North America, and parts of South America, where vast agricultural expansion took place before the study period.
Even the replacement of pastures, however, is likely to have implications for natural ecosystems. When croplands replace pastures, ranchers will clear forests and other natural ecosystems elsewhere to make up for the forgone grazing area if demand for and yields of livestock remain unchanged.
Thus, converting pastures into cropland indirectly triggers additional clearing of forests and other natural ecosystems. This “forest becomes pasture which later becomes cropland” land use trajectory is commonly observed in South America.
5. Total agricultural area expansion is even larger
The new study focuses on cropland expansion and did not cover livestock pastures or the direct conversion of forests and other natural vegetation to tree crops, such as oil palm, rubber, and cocoa.
Other studies have shown that pasture expansion replaced far more forest than tree crops and soy during roughly the same time period. This indicates that the 102 Mha of net cropland expansion is an underestimate of the destruction of natural lands for food production.
A strategy for addressing the global land squeeze
This new geospatial data adds to a growing body of evidence that the world faces intense competition for land — a true “land squeeze.” How then does humanity meet the agricultural needs of a growing population more equitably while at the same time meeting global ambitions on climate and biodiversity?
There are four basic strategies to do so — and they should be pursued simultaneously:
- Produce more food on existing agricultural land. That means higher crop and livestock yields, achieved in a manner that provides climate resilience and decreases emissions of greenhouse gases and other environmental pollution. Doing so in a manner that “leapfrogs” conventional approaches will be particularly critical for Africa to meet food security and climate stabilization at the same time.
- Protect remaining forests and other natural ecosystems. Such protection, in turn, can create an incentive to boost yields on productive lands.
- Reduce demand for agricultural land through efforts such as holding down meat consumption by the world’s largest meat consumers, curbing food loss and waste, and reversing policies such as bioenergy mandates that add to land-use demands.
- Restore forests and other habitats where agricultural land is marginal or unimprovable.
In short, “Produce, Protect, Reduce and Restore.”
Monitoring is an important input to all four strategies. Thanks to support from the Bezos Earth Fund, WRI’s Land & Carbon Lab and the University of Maryland will regularly update the unprecedented 98-foot resolution maps of cropland extent and change for the entire world, bringing local and global cropland dynamics into clear view. Such transparency is an essential step in ensuring humanity can feed itself without destroying nature in the process.